Here is Wilson as a kid watching the Packers |
As many of you know, I am a huge Green Bay Packers fan. I
could not put a date on when I started cheering for the Packers. What I can
tell you is that when the Packers played the Patriots in the Super Bowl in 4th
grade, I was the only person in the school rooting against Drew Bledsoe. My
fandom started because of Brett Favre, but I was on the bandwagon to switch QBs
after Favre was picked by the Giants in the NFC championship game. Since I am a
big Packers fan, I have watched just about every one of Rodgers starts in his
career. Sometimes life and living in New England has made it a bit more
challenging, but there are very few that I have missed.
All that was just to give you a little background my grounds for discussing a
topic that has bothered me for a few years – Aaron Rodgers is not very good
against a Cover 2 defense. This is relevant for those of you that might own
Aaron Rodgers in fantasy as he is facing the Chicago Bears, who almost
exclusively play Cover 2, in the next week of your fantasy postseason. I am
starting to write the introduction to this blog without analyzing any stats and
am just going by the eyeball test.
Before I do lack at the stats, here is a little information about the Cover 2.
I have heard analysts refer to it in a number of different ways this year as
there is some variation, but the key aspect is that you play two deep safeties.
These safeties are tasked with covering half the field each without letting an
offensive player behind them. Underneath there are a couple options – 1) you
can man up on each receiver and basically double team anything deep or 2) you
can play a complete zone and take away the passing lanes. In order for a Cover
2 to work, it is important for the defensive line to be able to generate a pass
rush without blitzing. Sometimes you will hear Chris Collinsworth call the
coverage a two deep shell, or hear the analysts talk about bumping at the line
of scrimmage because they have help over the top – it’s all about Cover 2.
Sure, there are more technicalities to the Cover 2 than what I have described,
but it gives you a basic concept. The Cover 2 is designed to take away the deep
ball.
Wilson is a part owner of the GB Packers |
Basic Cover 2 Defense |
1 of Jody's loooong TD catches |
Now if you watched the Packers at all last year, it is likely that you saw Greg Jennings and Jordy Nelson running free deep down the field; the big play was a critical part of the Packers 15-1 season. This year those deep plays have been few and far between. Last year the Packers had nine touchdowns of over 40 yards; this year they have four so far. Not a huge drop off you might say, but two of those 40+ yard touchdowns are to Tom Crabtree on plays where he got free underneath and had huge runs after the catch. Jordy Nelson has the other two touchdowns of over 40 yards; he had five last season. Injuries can be blamed for some of the lack of big play production, but it all ties in with the Cover 2.
Here is Aaron Rodgers average game started in his career (not counting the game in 2010 where he sustained a concussion against the Lions in the first half):
278 yards passing on 23 for 34 passing (67% completion percentage) with 2.1 touchdowns and 0.6 interceptions per game.
Now his career averages against the Bears (who have played Cover 2 every game since Rodgers became a starter):
244 yards passing on 22 for 32 passing (68% completion percentage) with 1.8 touchdowns and 0.7 interceptions per game.
Games Against the Bears Chart below
Comps
|
Attempts
|
Yds
|
TDs
|
INTs
|
23
|
30
|
227
|
2
|
1
|
24
|
39
|
260
|
2
|
1
|
17
|
28
|
184
|
1
|
0
|
16
|
24
|
180
|
0
|
0
|
34
|
45
|
316
|
1
|
1
|
19
|
28
|
229
|
1
|
1
|
28
|
38
|
297
|
3
|
1
|
21
|
29
|
283
|
5
|
0
|
22
|
32
|
219
|
1
|
1
|
22.66667
|
32.55556
|
243.8889
|
1.777778
|
0.666667
|
As you can see, most of the time he is very ordinary against the Bears. His 2011 game on Christmas stands out as a statistical anomaly that makes the numbers look a little more respectable. If you take that one game out, his averages look like this:
239 yards passing on 23 for 33 passing (69% completion percentage) with 1.4 touchdowns and 0.8 interceptions per game.
Suddenly, you have made Aaron Rodgers look like a very average quarterback. The one stat you might see and think “he’s actually better in some ways against the Bears” is his completion percentage. Yes, you are correct, his completion percentage is up because he is still a very intelligent quarterback. That intelligence tells him to take the short stuff that is available, but that makes him Checkdown Chad Pennington against the Cover 2, and hardly the 2011 NFL MVP.
The reason the Bears have been able to do this so effectively are the elements of their defense. Their safeties are not superstars, but they can still cover their respective sides of the field. Charles Tillman is an excellent physical corner who can make plays on the ball with help over the top. Tim Jennings, who has historically sucked, has supposedly been a shutdown corner this season. They have a pass rush generated by Julius Peppers, Israel Idonije, Henry Melton, and Shea McClellin (James’ editor note: BBBB BOISE STATE!). In the past, they had similar variables like Tommy Harris (when he was still good), Alex Brown, Adewale Ogunleye, and Mark Anderson. These defensive lines could get pressure without a blitz. Then, perhaps most critical of all, they had linebackers that could make plays. Brian Urlacher, Lance Briggs, and Nick Roach are all athletic enough to cover the pass and still stop the run. They are not the same now as they were in the past, but you can understand where it could be critical. The middle linebacker is especially critical as he is responsible for covering the middle of the field; even if that means covering 30 yards during field. It takes the right kind of athlete to take that away and Brian Urlacher is that type of player (at least he used to be).
Giants D line gave Brady NO time last Super Bowl |
The Giants were the same deal this season, but you can also look at the Seattle Seahawks. While we all know the Packers got screwed in that game, it was the Seahawks defensive formula that made the game close enough to come down to the last play. The Seahawks had strong defensive line in Chris Clemons, Bruce Irvin, etc, some physical roided up corners in Brandon Browner and Richard Sherman, and athletic linebackers like Bobby Wagner and KJ Wright.
All these elements are what make San Francisco’s defense so dominant as well. The strong defensive line of Aldon Smith and Justin Smith, the athletic linebacker ability of Patrick Willis and Navorro Bowman, and physical coverage on the outside by Tarrell Brown and Carlos Rogers make San Francisco very difficult to deal with. As you hear every week, the ability to rush the passer without blitzing is devastating. Bill Belichick knows this and has been frustrating Patriots fans for years by trying to execute this defense, but has lacked the personnel to do so.
So surely there must be weaknesses in the Cover 2 defense or else everyone would play it, right? Absolutely. The first way to break down the Cover 2 is by running the football. This is where Aaron Rodgers has been at an unfortunate disadvantage – the Packers running game has been awful. If you cannot force the safeties to be honest against the run, the ability to go down field will be taken away. The Packers won the Super Bowl two years ago because James Starks was just enough of a threat to allow Rodgers to use the play-action effectively.
Can Alex Green keep the Safties honest? |
The guy that is usually open? The tight end. This is part of the reason the tight end if so critical in the modern NFL. If you have an athlete like Jimmy Graham, Rob Gronkowski, or Aaron Hernandez, you can take advantage of those middle linebackers in a Cover 2 shell. The Packers have someone that is in that class of athleticism in Jermichael Finley, but he has been wildly inconsistent. A tight end that can run like a receiver is an enormous mismatch for any linebacker; even when Brian Urlacher was in his prime, he could not be expected to shut down someone like Antonio Gates (also no longer in his prime).
Most teams have caught on to how to stop the Packers this
season. His last four fantasy weeks since the Packers bye week have resulted in
17, 12, 17, and 15 point weeks (he scored 12 against the Bears in Week 2). The
weird thing is that this has been the way to beat the Packers since Rodgers
took the starting job. Rodgers is actually 7-2 against the Bears, but that has
more to do with the fact that he has been starting against Kyle Orton and Jay
Cutler than it does his own effectiveness. Every time it is Bears week, I get a
little bit nervous because I know it is just a bad matchup for the Packers. Not
having an offensive line to stop Julius Peppers, counting on James Starks, Ryan
Grant, Alex Green, DuJuan Harris to get a run game going, and knowing
Jermichael Finley will drop a wide open touchdown makes for frustrating
Sundays. These are just the basic facts. I have hardly even touched on the fact
that Rodgers just does not look like himself when faced with a Cover 2 shell.
So now it’s Week 15 and you wonder if you play Aaron Rodgers in hopes of making it to your own Super/Shiva Bowl. I say yes, you have to play him. This was a consensus Top 3 pick in most fantasy drafts. Who are you benching him for? I know, I just wrote almost four pages in Microsoft Word telling you why Rodgers cannot play against the Cover 2, but you have to have faith in the guy that brought you to the dance. You don’t get cute in the playoffs unless you’re a huge underdog. But here is the reason I feel better and better each week about Rodgers against the Cover 2…
So now it’s Week 15 and you wonder if you play Aaron Rodgers in hopes of making it to your own Super/Shiva Bowl. I say yes, you have to play him. This was a consensus Top 3 pick in most fantasy drafts. Who are you benching him for? I know, I just wrote almost four pages in Microsoft Word telling you why Rodgers cannot play against the Cover 2, but you have to have faith in the guy that brought you to the dance. You don’t get cute in the playoffs unless you’re a huge underdog. But here is the reason I feel better and better each week about Rodgers against the Cover 2…
Cobb the new Harvin? |
The new and in vogue way of beating the Cover 2 is by using a player with off
the charts quickness in the slots and trying to get him matched up with a
linebacker. The pioneer was Bill Belichick (not a surprise) with Wes Welker. He
needed a way to consistently beat Tony Dungy’s Cover 2 in Indianapolis, so
that’s where this idea originated. Percy Harvin and Darren Sproles also jump
into my mind as true “Cover 2 beaters”. The Packers, of course, have developed
Percy Harvin Junior in Randall Cobb. For some reason I will never understand,
Cobb had just one carry and one reception against the Bears in Week 2 this
season. He also had just four receptions for 39 yards against the Giants, and
one catch for -1 yards against the Seahawks. Against Indianapolis, Cobb had
four catches for 82 yards – the problem was they did not use him more often. He
is a total matchup nightmare. If you want to see how the Packers are 9-4, look
at the games where Cobb has been productive. With the exception of the first
game against San Francisco (which the Packers were a Jordy Nelson dropped pass
away from tying, and scoring 22 against San Francisco isn’t too shabby), the
Packers win when Cobb performs. Watching last night’s game made it clear to me
that Aaron Rodgers understands this. Greg Jennings had one catch, James Jones
two, Jermichael Finley two, and Cobb had seven.
Jordy Nelson is expected back in the lineup next week, which means Nelson and Jennings will draw Charles Tillman and Tim Jennings on the outside, which will allow Cobb and Finley to run free across the middle. If the running game can just be serviceable, the Packers are capable of lighting up a Bears team that has lost four of its last five. If the Packers win next week, they will clinch the NFC North, so it’s tough to believe they will come out flat. Plus, with the Falcons proving they are beatable, and the 49ers facing trips to New England and Seattle – the Packers still somehow have an outside shot at the #1 seed. If I realize this, you know the Packers realize this. Do you really want to doubt the Discount Double Check?
But I digress. While I have shown you the way to beat Aaron Rodgers, I have also shown how Rodgers can overcome it. For your fantasy playoff decisions, your faith in Aaron Rodgers should be tied to your faith in Randall Cobb. I am an Aaron Rodgers owner (both in fantasy and in reality – Go Pack Go!), and I will definitely be starting Rodgers this week.
Jordy Nelson is expected back in the lineup next week, which means Nelson and Jennings will draw Charles Tillman and Tim Jennings on the outside, which will allow Cobb and Finley to run free across the middle. If the running game can just be serviceable, the Packers are capable of lighting up a Bears team that has lost four of its last five. If the Packers win next week, they will clinch the NFC North, so it’s tough to believe they will come out flat. Plus, with the Falcons proving they are beatable, and the 49ers facing trips to New England and Seattle – the Packers still somehow have an outside shot at the #1 seed. If I realize this, you know the Packers realize this. Do you really want to doubt the Discount Double Check?
But I digress. While I have shown you the way to beat Aaron Rodgers, I have also shown how Rodgers can overcome it. For your fantasy playoff decisions, your faith in Aaron Rodgers should be tied to your faith in Randall Cobb. I am an Aaron Rodgers owner (both in fantasy and in reality – Go Pack Go!), and I will definitely be starting Rodgers this week.
James is debating
starting Josh Freeman over Aaron Rodgers. There is no question that by the
matchups, Josh Freeman has a better matchup; the Saints defense sucks. Freeman
threw for 420 yards and three TDs against the Saints earlier this season, so he
must be a stud. In fact, last year when Freeman sucked, he threw for at least
280 yards each game against the Saints as well. Here’s the difference – Doug
Martin. (James’ editor note: BBBB BOISE STATE!) Greg Schiano fully trusts his workhorse
now and having a good running game is critical on the road. If you have watched
the Saints play at home, you know they are another team all together in that
dome. If I am Tampa and had their porous pass defense, the last thing I want is
Drew Brees on the field any more than he has to be. So how do you achieve that?
Milk the clock with the run game. But can the Saints be run on? Yes – yes they
can. Opponents are averaging 150 yards rushing against the Saints this year,
which means the Saints have the worst rush defense in the NFL. The upside is
there for Josh Freeman, but you can’t bench your stud for a guy that the
Buccaneers would rather not use if they had their way. Rodgers is on your team
to be a monster; don’t outsmart yourself. If you have Rodgers, I can’t justify
benching him unless you have someone named Brady, Brees, or Manning as well.
The upside is just too high.
Freeman and Rodgers embrace after a game |
Yikes, typo city.
ReplyDelete